How Community Colleges Can Help End Intergenerational Poverty

How Community Colleges Can Help End Intergenerational Poverty

How Community Colleges Can Help End Intergenerational Poverty

For community colleges, student success is about more than graduation. It’s about creating pathways that change the trajectory of families and communities.

Mike Flores, Chancellor of the Alamo Colleges District, believes higher education has a unique role to play in breaking the cycle of intergenerational poverty. At Alamo, that mission has become the institution’s “Moonshot”: ending intergenerational poverty in the San Antonio region through education and training, in partnership with others.

Education as an economic catalyst

Flores argues that earning a postsecondary credential remains one of the strongest predictors of long-term economic mobility. Whether it’s a short-term industry credential, a certificate, or a degree, education creates opportunities for better jobs, higher earnings, and greater financial stability.

That’s why Alamo is expanding pathways that meet students where they are and connect them to careers more quickly.

Building pathways through partnership

One example is the Alamo Technical Institute, which offers short-term, stackable credentials aligned with employer needs. Students can earn workforce-recognized credentials in weeks, enter the workforce, and continue building toward higher credentials over time.

Flores says these efforts succeed because they are built alongside employers, community organizations, and education partners, creating a network that helps students progress without unnecessary barriers.

The bottom line

Ending intergenerational poverty requires more than access to college. It requires clear pathways, strong partnerships, and credentials that create lasting economic opportunity for students and their families.

Transcript

Your content goes here. Edit or remove this text inline or in the module Content settings. You can also style every aspect of this content in the module Design settings and even apply custom CSS to this text in the module Advanced settings.

Executive Brief: Senate Continuing Resolution Delays OMB Uniform Guidance Revisions

Overview

The Senate’s bipartisan Continuing Resolution (CR), released on August 2, 2026, includes a provision that would temporarily delay implementation of the Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) proposed revisions to the Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Part 200) through December 11, 2026. If enacted, the provision would preserve the current federal grant management framework while Congress completes appropriations negotiations and OMB continues reviewing public comments on the proposed rule.

The Continuing Resolution must still be reconciled with the House version before a final funding measure can be sent to the President for signature. As negotiations continue, the provision delaying implementation of the Uniform Guidance revisions could be modified, retained, or removed.

Why It Matters

Many Presidents Forum institutions receive federal grants and other forms of federal financial assistance that are governed by the Uniform Guidance. The proposed revisions represent one of the most significant updates to federal grant administration in more than a decade, with potential implications for grant oversight, compliance requirements, and the administration of federal financial assistance across agencies.

If the delay is included in the final appropriations measure, institutions will continue operating under the existing Uniform Guidance through December 11, 2026. This would provide additional time to evaluate the proposed changes, monitor federal guidance, and prepare for any future implementation requirements.

What Institutions Should Monitor

Over the coming months, Presidents Forum institutions should monitor several developments:

  • Whether the final Continuing Resolution retains the provision delaying implementation of the Uniform Guidance revisions.
  • Any announcements from OMB regarding a revised implementation timeline or changes to the proposed rule following its review of public comments.
  • Guidance issued by federal agencies and higher education associations regarding compliance expectations during the delay period.
  • Potential operational, compliance, and administrative impacts if the revised Uniform Guidance ultimately takes effect.

Looking Ahead

Until a final appropriations measure is enacted, institutions should continue complying with the current Uniform Guidance requirements. The Presidents Forum will monitor congressional negotiations, OMB rulemaking, and related federal guidance, providing updates as additional information becomes available.

 

Student-Centered Design Starts With Simplicity

Student-Centered Design Starts With Simplicity

Student-Centered Design Starts With Simplicity

Student success isn’t just about providing more resources—it’s about making the path to a degree easier to navigate.

David Schejbal, President of Excelsior University, believes today’s students, especially working adults, value clarity as much as flexibility. They want to know exactly what it will take to graduate, how long it will take, and what it will cost.

At Excelsior, that means creating clear academic pathways, simplifying credit transfer, strengthening advising and success coaching, and helping students navigate financial aid with confidence.

Looking ahead, Schejbal believes partnerships between institutions can further reduce barriers by making credit transfer seamless and giving students greater flexibility without sacrificing time, money, or progress toward a credential.

For today’s learners, student-centered design means reducing complexity so students can focus on completing their education—not navigating the system.

Transcript

Cameron M (00:47.726)
Welcome back to the President’s Forum Podcast. Today we’re talking about student centricity, what it looks like to design programs, policies, and supports around the realities of today’s learners, and what actually moves the needle on persistence, completion, and time to credential. President David Scable is back with us to share what Excelsior University is seeing and what’s working. David, thanks for joining us.

David (01:20.546)
Thanks, Cameron. Good to be with you.

Cameron M (01:22.786)
So when you think about student centricity right now, what’s changed most about who’s who today’s learners are and what institutions have to get right to meet them where they are?

David (01:33.484)
Well, about twenty years ago we started talking a lot more about adult students. So I wouldn’t say that today’s different in that regard. I think what’s different about students in general, whether they’re adult students or more traditional age students, is that they’re very much focused on the value of their education. And many students interpret value by what type of job they’re gonna be able to get after they they graduate.

In my opinion, they tend to be too narrow in their definition of value of higher ed because you get a lot more out of higher ed than just a good job. But today’s many students, that’s what they’re focused on.

Cameron M (02:15.873)
Yeah, yeah, definitely. I think that we can find the value much more than just our earnings, but also that’s yeah, that’s what students are often focused on. So I think that’s a good point. if you had to pick one or two student success initiatives that have had the biggest impact on persistence and completion at Excelsior, what are they and why do you think they work?

David (02:38.571)
Well, especially when it comes to adult students, what adult students don’t want is to be confused. And what often confuses students is too many choices. So where in a typical curriculum students have

general education requirements, they have core requirements, et cetera, et cetera, and then they have to choose courses towards their major. What helps adult students is to have a very clear path of courses that they have to take. Because whenever I talk to a student, the first question that the student asks is, what do I have to do to graduate? And the next question is, and how much is it going to cost and how long is it going to take?

And so giving them a clear answer for what do they have to do is really important. So many students, especially adult students, transfer credits in because they’ve gone to other schools. So helping them understand how many credits are going to transfer.

How many classes they have to take, in what order they have to take those classes, and don’t confuse them with a bunch of choices. Help them make very clear decisions and put together a clear plan. So I think that’s step one. Step two is just really good support structures for the students. So academic advising is important, but for many adult students, so is success coaching.

Cameron M (04:08.075)
Mm-hmm.

David (04:08.887)
helping them understand how to be better at managing their time, how to be better at managing their finances, how to juggle work and family and school and all of the responsibilities that they have. A lot of people just need a little support. So I think that’s the other really important piece.

Cameron M (04:27.137)
Yeah, yeah, definitely. That d that advising and the coaching is so important and and trying to be maybe proactive instead of reactive. So how do you design those advising and coaching practices so that it can be proactive and it can help these adult learners that are juggling so much?

David (04:48.331)
Well, we certainly do a lot of research. there’s plenty of research that’s been done out there about student success and student motivation, student persistence. So it’s important to be familiar with the literature. But nothing beats talking to students, asking them what do you need? how are you doing? are there things that are preventing you from persisting? Are there things that we as the institution

Can do to help you succeed. So it’s being real with students and having really genuine conversations.

Cameron M (05:25.675)
Yeah. Yeah, I think that’s the best way to go. That’s really important. sometimes some of some decisions we make that have a really big impact seem small on paper. Can you give us an example of a policy or program design choice that might have seemed small on paper but makes a real difference in reducing time to credential?

David (05:49.262)
Credit transfer is always top of the list, making sure that credits will transfer. Sometimes an institution will say, well, you know, English 101 will transfer, but English 102 will not.

Whereas at many schools, English 101 and 102 might be the same class. So being really thoughtful about facilitating credit transfer, making it easy for students to understand how trans that credits transfer, and then expediting that credit review at the institution so students understand what they will still need to do, how many credits they need to take right from the beginning when they’re interested in their in the program. The other thing that’s really

Important is being as clear and simple about financial aid as possible. Many students are mystified by financial aid, it’s a scary process, and they need a little help in understanding how to fill out a FAFSA and how to apply for aid, what pockets of aid might be available to them, because in addition to federal aid, many states have state aid. So really helping students navigate that world of financial aid.

Cameron M (07:05.579)
Yeah, financial aid is such an important one. And also the credit transfer. I remember back in the day trying to transfer myself and and that was always that was a scary time trying to figure out what I could what I could bring with me. So that’s a very, very important thing. now let’s look ahead. What’s one support you think more institutions should be building or rebuilding to better serve today’s students over the next couple of years?

David (07:34.667)
Well, I’ll tell you what we’re focused on at Excelsior. So what we’re focused on is creating partnerships with other institutions that help students function within a network of schools so that much of the bureaucracy is taken out of the mix for the student. So for example, we were just talking about credit transfer. If you imagine a what I call a constellation of institutions that a

Cameron M (07:37.249)
Yeah.

David (08:04.591)
Agree to make transfer seamless for students, for example. So a student can take a class at this institution, a class at that institution, and graduate from the third institution without loss of credit, without loss of time, and without loss of money. That’s really important. So I think those kinds of partnerships are going to become more and more prevalent as we go down the line because it’s an important part of.

Of being more competitive and schools have a lot of competition right now. It was not something that schools needed to worry about 15-20 years ago. And so you saw really poor credit transfer processes. So I think that’s one area that’s likely to change a lot over the next, say, five years.

Cameron M (08:53.803)
Yeah, yeah, that makes a lot of sense. And this this constellation is also so helpful for the students and access in time to completion. So I think that’s that’s really an important work that that we could see implemented more throughout the country and and in in the higher ed. David, I think that wraps up our conversation today. Thank you for joining us. For our listeners, you can see more from us at

PresidentsForum dot org and on our social medias. David, thanks for joining.

David (09:28.653)
It was a pleasure, thank you.

Cameron M (09:30.126)
Thanks.

Why Partnerships Are Becoming Essential to Higher Education’s Future

Why Partnerships Are Becoming Essential to Higher Education’s Future

Why Partnerships Are Becoming Essential to Higher Education’s Future

Partnerships are no longer just a strategy for growth—they’re becoming a strategy for student success.

David Schejbal, President of Excelsior University, believes higher education is entering a period where collaboration between institutions, employers, and other organizations will become increasingly important. The goal isn’t simply expanding institutional reach. It’s creating a more seamless experience for students.

Reducing friction for students

Excelsior is developing what Schejbal calls a “constellation” model—a network of collaborating institutions and employers designed around student success rather than institutional boundaries.

The vision is simple: students should be able to transfer more easily, receive credit for workplace learning and internships, and move between educational opportunities without losing time, money, or academic progress.

Employers are part of the solution

The model also creates stronger partnerships with employers.

Rather than viewing education and employment as separate systems, employers become active participants by helping shape learning opportunities, supporting workforce development, and creating clearer pathways from education to careers.

The bottom line

As higher education evolves, partnerships can help institutions expand opportunity, reduce barriers, and better serve students throughout their educational and career journeys.

Transcript

Wesley Smith (00:00.494)
David, thanks so much for making time to join the podcast this morning.

David (00:07.832)
Anytime, thanks for inviting me.

Wesley Smith (00:10.166)
hey, we’re talking about partnerships this month, the month of August in the president’s forum. And I know that this is an issue that is near and dear to your heart. So let’s let’s talk first a really big picture question. As as a president, what kind of of emphasis do you place on partnerships as a strategy?

David (00:35.839)
well we think that partnerships are are the solution to prosperous future. and I and that’s not hy high hyperbole. I I really mean that. I’ve been paying attention to what’s been happening in healthcare for the past 30, 40 years. And there’s no question that healthcare has gone through a tremendous consolidation phase. And I think that higher education is at the beginning of a similar phase. And so

These partnerships in higher ed are really either key to survival for some smaller schools or they’re key to to growth and scaling for more established institutions. And and in the case of state schools, especially state schools that are parts of larger state systems, from a financial perspective, the smaller campuses simply cannot remain on their own. So I think partnerships can

Consolidations, MA, different kinds of of affiliations among institutions is going to be the key to the future in higher education.

Wesley Smith (01:44.653)
Yeah, there’s no question in my mind that that the landscape is going to be massively impacted by partnerships moving forward. And then, you know, just strategic initiatives for institution by institution will be impacted by that. So you’ve talked a lot about, you know, the big picture on on partnerships in higher education. Tell us a little bit about what you’re you what you’re thinking is with regard to institutional partnerships, especially with employers.

and other stakeholders that are really important to, you know, the outcomes of education for Excelsior.

David (02:20.718)
Sure. So I think one of the big

Challenges that large higher education systems have had in the past is that from the student perspective, there’s no benefit. A student by going to a school in a system doesn’t get to transfer more easily. There’s no guarantee that the credits will transfer if the student does, et cetera, et cetera. And so what we’re trying to do is form a different series of partnerships. You can call it a system-like model.

Although it’s definitely not going to be like a traditional system. But the big difference in what we’re trying to create is.

A frictionless ecosystem from the perspective of the student. So what I always say is that at Excelsior, we only have one mission, and that is our student success. Most institutions have many missions. They are focused on research, they’re focused on faculty, they’re focused on community engagement. We think those things are important, but those things for us are secondary compared to student success. And so then the question is from the perspective

Of a student, especially adult students, what do they need? Well, what they need is ease of transfer, they need good PLA, and they need to be assured that if they move among institutions, that they’re not going to lose credit, time, or money. And so what we’re trying to do is build work, we call it a constellation, a network of

David (03:59.545)
Collaborating institutions, in some cases parts of MAs, in other cases affiliations or just partnerships, where the institutions agree on that seamlessness from the perspective of students. And we are also inviting employers to be parts of those of that ecosystem. So from an employer perspective, if an employer is part of the ecosystem,

We work out, for example, how internships count toward credit so that students automatically get the credit towards their degree. We also provide the ecosystem as a one-stop shop for the employer. Single place to pay for education if the employers want to use the the education benefits, a place to go shopping for talent, a place to engage in talking about what.

Is needed from the employer’s perspective, and how that dovetails with curricula that are within that ecosystem, and so on. So it really is intended as a lifelong home for students and a place to take the friction out of the higher education employer process so that students can move more seamlessly among institutions within the system and among employers that are taking advantage of.

the system.

Wesley Smith (05:28.59)
So how has this been received by specifically employers? I mean, this is a a really nice thing for the students. Are employers willing to say, hey, yeah, this this is a better model of of partnership?

David (05:41.785)
They are. as a matter of fact, we started we we used to be part of guilt and we have we have ended that partnership. And and and

The the challenge with guild, what I think from an employer perspective is that yeah, it’s a single place, it’s a single payer option, but but it doesn’t give you any access to the curriculum, to the academics. And because guild doesn’t have any control over the academics. In the in the constellation, of course, when employers join, they get the benefits of the single payer model.

But they also get the benefits of a comprehensive curriculum across different disciplines, across levels in disciplines, micro-credentials to doctoral degrees and everything in between. And so we already have a couple of

healthcare, large healthcare partnerships that are very engaged in this. And more employers are showing interest because it solves their problems in two ways. they don’t have to worry about reimbursing their employees for benefits one employee at a time, and they get this entire ecosystem to shop in and for their employees to to learn in.

Wesley Smith (07:09.518)
Right, right. That makes a ton of sense to me. if if other presidents and other institutions are out there thinking about this and and trying to figure out, well, how can how could we replicate this or what are the key principles, you know, to starting something like this? What what would your advice be?

David (07:28.622)
Well, it’s not an easy thing to start. I’d say rather than trying to recreate more versions of the same thing, it would be much smarter to try to partner in this and grow the the system because

The more opportunities we give to students, the more they’re gonna benefit. And the more opportunities we keep the the ecosystem as a singular system rather than trying to create four or five, which just fragments the fragments the the the system and creates the same problem that I’ve been talking about. so so it’ll be better for the students. So

I’d say let’s have those conversations together and see if we can figure out how to plug various institutions into one ecosystem.

Wesley Smith (08:17.548)
Yeah, yeah. Okay. Now let me let me zoom back out, David, because I know that of all of our presidents, you you really have your your finger on the pulse of mergers, acquisitions, you know, the the the macro side of higher education. How would you say the constellation mindset impacts kind of the macro side?

David (08:41.274)
say more what you mean.

Wesley Smith (08:44.286)
Well okay, so let me let me re-ass this question. I’m I’ll I’m just we’ll cut this part out, Des. I’m I’m just gonna re-ass this. Okay. So David, y you are one of the presidents who has their you know, you you’re monitoring and you’re watching macro work in in higher education, especially with regards to mergers, acquisitions, what’s happening to institutions across the board. you have

a really collaborative style where you know you’re looking with your partners, you’re working on on collaborating internally, you’re working to benefit students. Can you just revisit the macro side for a second? How does how do partnerships benefit students currently in the system when presidents are more willing to to look at partnerships as a solution?

David (09:34.511)
Sure, great question. So what I think that there are three attitudinal differences among university presidents. one group believes it’s completely bulletproof, well-endowed institution, very selective, etc. They have no interest in partnerships, they want to continue their exclusivity. Okay, so they’re not gonna play. another group is

Convinced that if you ignore it, it’ll go away. So it’s a group of of denial precedents, what I what what I’ll call them, and that the problem really doesn’t exist. And if you if you don’t believe it exists, then it doesn’t. And then I think that there’s the final group that’s realistic about the changes that are happening. And then they have to make a decision about where they fit.

we’ve had schools approach us and say, We want to become part of Excelsior. And and my question to them is, do you want to be affiliated and essentially remain independent? And in in the two cases that we’re finishing up right now, both said no, we want to become integrated into Excelsior. We have another partner right now.

That wants to remain independent and share curricula and really focus on growing adult adult market share. And then we have another potential partner that is an entire campus, and and they’re interested in really making sure that the campus survives and having us take over all of the online pieces. So if the partnerships vary a lot. From the student perspective, I think what is important about the partnerships is that it creates a bigger

Easier to navigate universe for the student. So as opposed to a student having to choose, I want to go to an online school or I want to go to a brick and mortar school or I want to do you know whatever, the student has the entire universe. So maybe wants to start online and then do some intensive in-person experiences, or vice versa, start at a campus.

David (11:56.184)
then gets a job, maybe gets a job in a different part of the country, wants to work in it and also study online, but still wants to attend some in-person intensive experiences.

The the constellation model that we’re built developing allows students to do all of that. And so we now have opportunities for students to study in Florida, in the Chicago, Milwaukee area, and in California, in addition to Albany, New York, which is where we’re headquartered, and of course a broad array of online opportunities, not to mention opportunities for nursing students that include clinicals in 17 states across the country.

Wesley Smith (12:39.308)
Yeah. Yeah. Well, David, we we really appreciate you joining us today and we appreciate your, you know, strong expertise in the collaboration area and and and the experience that you’ve shared with us. Thanks for thanks for sharing that, Witt.

David (12:55.054)
Thank you.

Wesley Smith (12:56.642)
All right. Hey, d David, let me let me give me one second. I you were breaking up you were breaking up in that last one. Let me let me do the outro one more time. Okay. Or just the conclusion. Yeah. well David, thank you so much for joining us today. We appreciate your time and and the experience that you shared with our listeners, and we’re looking forward to having you back again soon.

David (12:59.31)
Yeah. Yeah, yeah.

David (13:20.613)
Thanks Wes, always a pleasure.

Partnerships That Expand Opportunity

Partnerships That Expand Opportunity

Partnerships That Expand Opportunity

As the Presidents Forum moves through August, one theme continues to emerge across our work: partnerships.

Through our Innovation Listening Sessions with college and university presidents, we’re gathering ideas and insights to help shape our November meeting in Dallas. One message has been consistent: meaningful innovation rarely happens in isolation.

This month, we’ll highlight examples of institutions working alongside employers, community organizations, technology partners, and public leaders to expand access, strengthen workforce pathways, and improve student outcomes.

We’re also continuing to monitor key policy developments, including the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and congressional efforts to address the Pell Grant funding shortfall. We’ll keep members informed as these issues evolve.

At the Presidents Forum, partnerships remain central to advancing accountable innovation and creating more opportunities for today’s learners.

Transcript

As we move through August, the Presidents Forum is focused on a theme that continues to show up across all areas of our work: the power of partnerships.

We’ve been conducting Innovation Listening Sessions with presidents to prepare for our upcoming meeting in Dallas this November. These conversations are giving us valuable insight into the challenges, opportunities, and big ideas shaping the future of higher education.

One thing we’re hearing clearly is that meaningful innovation rarely happens in isolation. It happens through strong partnerships — between institutions, employers, community organizations, and state and federal leaders. This month we’ll see powerful examples of colleges and universities working together with partners to expand access, better serve learners, and respond to workforce needs in new and practical ways.

On the policy front, the NDAA, which includes provisions related to military tuition assistance, is still being considered. And it remains to be seen how Congress will address the Pell shortfall, which continues to be a significant issue for students and institutions alike.

As always, we’ll continue monitoring these developments and sharing updates as they unfold.

Thanks for watching, and stay tuned for more throughout the month.