What One Financial Aid Expert Learned as a Parent

What One Financial Aid Expert Learned as a Parent

What One Financial Aid Expert Learned as a Parent

Amy Glynn has spent more than 20 years working in higher education and financial aid leadership.

But when she recently helped her daughter navigate the college search and financial aid process, she found the experience surprisingly difficult.

After interacting with more than 20 institutions, Glynn said the process often lacked clarity, consistency, and straightforward communication around cost and affordability.

Her experience reinforces broader national data. According to Strada research, only one-third of students and families describe the financial aid process as seamless or easy to understand.


Why financial aid friction creates barriers for students

For many students and families, financial aid information is fragmented across multiple systems and formats.

Cost of attendance may appear in one portal. Scholarships may appear somewhere else. Aid eligibility and financing details are often separated as well.

Even standard programs like the Western Undergraduate Exchange are presented differently by institutions, making comparisons difficult for families trying to make enrollment decisions.

Glynn argues that institutions need to simplify the process by delivering clearer, more integrated financial aid communication.


What institutions can do differently

Glynn’s recommendations are intentionally simple.

Institutions should provide financial aid offers in formats families can easily access and understand. Terminology should remain consistent across systems and communications: students should not need to navigate multiple portals to determine what college will actually cost.

She also argues institutions should adopt a more human-centered approach when students and families contact financial aid offices with questions.

The goal is not only transparency. It is reducing uncertainty during one of the most consequential decisions students make.


Why financial aid teams are under extraordinary pressure

Glynn emphasizes that financial aid professionals themselves are not the problem.

Institutions are managing rapidly changing regulations, complex compliance requirements, outdated technology systems, and staffing limitations simultaneously.

Financial aid offices are balancing federal requirements, state regulations, institutional budgeting pressures, and student support responsibilities all at once.

This creates a broader institutional challenge rather than an individual staffing issue.


Why presidents should pay attention

Financial aid communication has become a student success issue.

Glynn points to another critical statistic: nearly 87 percent of students who stop out of college cite financial barriers as a major reason for leaving.

At a time when more than 42 million Americans have some college but no credential, reducing financial friction may be one of the most important student-centered strategies institutions can pursue.

Transcript

Wes (00:00.898) Amy, I understand that your daughter graduates from high school tomorrow. Is that right? Tomorrow. Big day. Big day. OK.

Amy Glynn (00:08.959) Tomorrow, 10 a.m.

Fake t-

Wes (00:16.142) No, no, no, I’m going to change the subject from the graduation to the year prior to graduation. You’ve been looking at higher ed institutions with your daughter, and I know you’ve made some campus visits, and she’s very fortunate to have a parent who has very deep expertise in enrollment, in financial aid, in all the details in higher education.

Amy Glynn (00:19.199) Okay. Okay.

Amy Glynn (00:30.239) Mm-hmm.

Wes (00:44.407) And I would love to hear your experience and how that went for you and your daughter as you were looking for higher education institutions that fit for her.

Amy Glynn (00:55.455) Yeah, I wish I could tell you that 20 plus years in higher ed and financial aid was an advantage for us as we shopped universities, but unfortunately, I’m not sure that it was. The process was very difficult, a little bit disenfranchising as someone who has communicated with students about cost and affordability for so long. And I’ll share with you that

That financial friction that we’ve talked about where students just are not getting the information they need in a consumable way about cost, affordability, value is really real. Stratus research actually showed that only one third of students and parents found it to be a seamless, good, understandable process.

And we interacted with over 20 institutions across the nation. And I can’t say that a third of them did it well.

Wes (02:03.106) So that’s not, I mean, we’ve got this really persuasive anecdote coming from one of our, you know, most highly proficient financial aid experts that you could have out there looking. I mean, you’ve run financial aid at institutions, you understand this, and we have the strata data that tells us that only a third of students and parents had a seamless.

experience in this or a smooth experience. So we’re seeing this anecdotally as well as in the data.

Amy Glynn (02:39.957) Yep. Yeah, we absolutely are. And I would say, if I could give advice, I would remind institutions to get back to basics. Communicate.

Wes (02:51.309) What does that look like?

Amy Glynn (02:53.759) you know, this is gonna sound really crazy. It means that you send a paper financial aid offer letter or you send an offer letter in a PDF format to a family. You don’t send them out to your student information systems portal where they have to find cost of attendance in one place, scholarships in another, financial aid in another. Some institutions portals only give you the information per semester, not per year.

We are in Arizona, so we have access to WUE, which is the Western Undergraduate Exchange, which is a tuition reduction for students who attend. And I can tell you, institutions all display it differently. Some take it right out of their cost of attendance, some list it as a scholarship, some do something else with it. And so there’s no consistency even within the awarding of the same fund type across all of the institutions.

So we need to get back to basics. We need to use the same terminology that we’ve all agreed to in the NASPA Principles of Excellence. We need to look at best practice and communicating cost, comprehensive cost and affordability. And we need to be a little bit more humanistic when a family calls in with questions for our aid offices.

Wes (04:18.464) Amy, is really, it’s very basic. We need to get back to the basics is what I’m hearing.

Amy Glynn (04:25.374) We do, but Wes, I also feel like as much disappointment as I have for the experience and concern that I have for students who don’t have a parent who’s familiar with the industry. I also need to say like being a financial aid professional right now is not easy. The technology is not built to match the needs of the financial aid system that we have. The regulatory environment is not about creating the best student experience.

Wes (04:41.879) Right.

Amy Glynn (04:54.056) and institutions are trying to balance the demands of the Department of Education and their state regulatory bodies with the needs of their students. We all know that institutions are being very, they’re being very deliberate about budgeting, about hiring, about expenses. And so for presidents to hear that.

high quality staff, that high quality technology and investing in those student experiences around financial aid is really, really important. 87 % of students who have stepped out of school said that some form of financial barrier is the reason that they left, right? We have 42 million students on college with no degree and 87 % of them are saying that it is financial barriers that is causing them to step away from their education.

Wes (05:35.0) Right.

Wes (05:46.264) So every president should perk up at this conversation to be like, hey, need to have some, this is an area that requires and deserves presidential attention.

Amy Glynn (06:00.242) It does. Attention in a very thoughtful, inquisitive manner. I just want to remind people, now is not the time to attack. Everybody has the best intentions that are working with our students. So just keeping that in mind as we ask the right questions about what does our student experience look

Wes (06:23.788) Yeah, we can attest to the pressure of the financial aid systems at every institution and the personnel because we’re working on executive rulemaking, I mean, on week-to-week basis and things are changing and deadlines are insane. It’s just a really tough time to be able to manage that side as well as focus on student transparency, reducing financial friction.

Amy Glynn (06:39.443) Yes.

It is.

Wes (06:50.818) communicating very clearly when regulations are changing on a timeline that’s almost unthinkable in the past.

Amy Glynn (07:01.396) It truly is. Yes, it is unbelievable what is being managed right now. And that’s why we need the right systems and structures in place to be able to navigate this more seamlessly in the future.

Wes (07:16.334) Well, Amy, we appreciate you bringing your parental experience as well as your experience as a higher ed administrator and professional. Thanks for joining us today.

Amy Glynn (07:27.765) Thanks for having me.

Financial Friction Is Still the Barrier We’re Not Fixing

Financial Friction Is Still the Barrier We’re Not Fixing

Financial Friction Is Still the Barrier We’re Not Fixing

Strada Education Foundation released its Student-Centered Enrollment Management Principles, a timely and necessary framework for a system that too often asks students to navigate complexity without clarity.

At their core, these principles emphasize something students and families have been saying for years: they need transparency, predictability, and trust in the college decision-making process.

And yet, the current reality tells a very different story.

This year, I experienced the process not as a policy professional or a financial aid professional, but as a parent. My high school senior applied to nearly 20 institutions. Of those, only one provided a complete financial aid offer before decision day. Many institutions are still reviewing scholarship applications while simultaneously pressuring students to commit.

That disconnect isn’t just frustrating, it’s inequitable.

When students are asked to make one of the most significant financial decisions of their lives without full information, we are not just creating confusion, we are reinforcing what I’ve long described as financial friction: the unnecessary complexity that stands between students and their ability to enroll, persist, and complete. After watching my own student navigate this process, that insight feels more relevant than ever.

In the book, Student Financial Success: A Surprising Path to Fix the College Completion Crisis, my co-authors and I argued that the system itself, not students or institutions, are often the root cause of these breakdowns. And we offered three simple principles to guide a better path forward:

  • Chart a personal path
  • Unlock every dollar
  • Cut through complexity

What I saw this year reinforced just how far we still have to go.

Students can’t unlock every dollar when aid packages are incomplete or delayed. They can’t effectively chart a personal path without clear, comparable financial information. And instead of helping them cut through complexity, too many of our current processes add to it.

Strada’s principles make clear that incremental change is no longer enough. Achieving real results will require institutions to rethink long-standing practices:

  • From opacity to transparency in pricing and aid
  • From institutional timelines to student-centered timelines
  • From fragmented processes to coordinated, student-first systems

This is not just about improving enrollment outcomes. It’s about addressing the root cause of why students stop out in the first place. As we highlighted in Student Financial Success, financial barriers not academic ones are often the primary driver of attrition.

If we are serious about access, equity, and restoring trust in higher education, then aligning to student-centered principles isn’t optional; it’s foundational. Because a student-centered system doesn’t just recruit students. It ensures they can afford to say yes, with clarity, confidence, and a real path to completion.

The question isn’t whether we agree with these principles. It’s whether we are willing to change enough to achieve them. So I’ll ask my colleagues across higher ed: If students can’t see a full, clear financial picture before they’re asked to commit, are we truly student-centered?

Transcript

Wes (00:00.172) Amy, if a president asked you what’s the single most student-centered change that we can make right now to reduce the financial aid friction, if you were using the Strada principles as the guide, what would you tell them to do in the next 90 days and why?

Amy Glynn (00:20.446) Yeah, so I think if a president asked me that question, I’d say the most student-centered move you can make in the next 90 days is to try and eliminate uncertainty around how much students will actually pay for college at the point that they need to make that enrollment decision. So only a third of students and families reported a straightforward financial aid experience in Stratus assessment. And so we need to evaluate how financial aid is delivered so students aren’t piecing together

cost of attendance, financial aid eligibility, scholarships, net price, financing options across multiple systems, right? That’s a lot of data to try and pull together from a lot of different places. So instead, they should be experiencing a clear integrated funding plan where the math is done for them. They’re using standard terminology and the student can just see what college is gonna cost, but how it will be covered and the options that exist to address any remaining gaps.

One practical step I’d urge every president to take is walk through their own financial aid notification process as a student would. Because if it’s not clear to our leadership in higher education, it’s almost certainly not gonna be clear to students. But when I say that, Wes, I wanna be really clear, financial aid professionals are not the barrier here, right? Like they are so underwater with everything that’s going on. They’re operating in outdated systems, limited staffing.

Wes (01:33.292) Yeah, absolutely.

Amy Glynn (01:48.872) We don’t even need to get into the increased compliance complexity right now and they’re still trying to serve students. So this change is not intent, it’s scaffolding. Institutions need the time, the staff, the integrated systems that allow financial aid enrollment teams to deliver that timely, complete and student-ready information. And we know this matters because financial barriers drive the vast number of stopouts.

Wes (01:54.193) right.

Amy Glynn (02:19.382) Nearly 87 % of students who leave school do so for one of two or three financial reasons. And we know that we have 42 million students with some college no degree. So that’s, I’m not gonna do the math, can’t do the math, but like that’s a lot of students that are being impacted by the financial friction. So put really simply, the way that we begin to solve the completion crisis is by reducing financial friction through a personalized funding path.

that helps every student unlock every dollar possible so that they can move forward with clarity and not guesswork around how they’re gonna pay for school.

Wes (02:56.43) Amy, I love your emphasis on transparency and providing clear communication to the student. think if presidents follow that North Star, can’t go wrong.

Amy Glynn (03:09.354) Thanks, I agree.

Wes (03:12.002) Thanks, Amy.

Competition is an Illusion: How Higher Ed Partnerships Can Increase Access to Online Learning – Sooner than Later

Competition is an Illusion: How Higher Ed Partnerships Can Increase Access to Online Learning – Sooner than Later

By Kate Smith, president of Rio Salado College, and Trevor Kubatzke, president of Lake Michigan College

The demand for online learning has surged in the last 5 years; however, many colleges are struggling to keep pace. According to a 2025 Changing Landscape of Online Education (CHLOE 10) Report and forbes.com analysis, nearly 9 in 10 colleges plan to expand online offerings but many do not have the technology, funding, faculty readiness, and other critical structures in place to make the transition fast enough to meet learner demands. 

Lake Michigan College (LMC) and Rio Salado College presidents came up with a solution that’s been working since 2022 – a partnership agreement that gives LMC students the option to complete some courses online with Rio Salado. 

The partnership, which is the first of its kind in the country, resulted from a conversation between LMC’s President Trevor A. Kubatzke and Rio Salado’s President Kate Smith during an Alliance for Innovation and Transformation conference a few years ago. 

The outcome — LMC was able to enhance its offerings and provide online learning options to its 3,300 students without the logistical barriers or expense of expanding instructional development, staffing courses, or integrating an online platform. 

LMC students enrolled in 174 Rio Salado class seats last academic year, which were previously unavailable to them in an online modality. 

“This is a model of mutual support, not competition,” said President Smith. “When students win – we all win.” 

LMC serves as the home institution, providing academic advising, enrollment support, and degree credit for courses completed through Rio Salado. LMC students pay in-district tuition rates, not out-of-state tuition. 

“At Lake Michigan College, our commitment is to remove every barrier that stands between our students and their goals,” said President Kubatzke. “This partnership with Rio Salado College does exactly that. By allowing our students to access specialized courses at our domestic tuition rate, we’re expanding what a Lake Michigan College education can look like without asking students to sacrifice affordability. This is what it means to put students first.” 

Current offerings include American Sign Language, French, Arabic, Chinese, and Insurance courses, as well as courses to complete an Advanced Certificate in Cybersecurity.

Students can access the expanded catalog through LMC’s advising process and seamlessly enroll in Rio Salado courses as part of their academic plan, supported by advisors at their home campus who help them navigate which courses transfer and apply toward graduation requirements. 

A streamlined payment processing structure supports a smooth transition for students, as does LMC’s robust Student Information System, which enables efficient data exchange and supports timely administrative processes. Equally important, is the consistent engagement of faculty and administration from both colleges, who are committed to working in a spirit of collaboration. 

The investment has paid off for both colleges, increasing enrollments and opportunities for new course offerings to meet other student interests. 

“Innovation at Rio Salado College has always been rooted in increasing access to higher learning and student success, especially by way of partnerships,” said President Smith. “Our growing partnership with Lake Michigan College demonstrates what’s possible when institutions lean into collaboration with a common goal. By sharing our online expertise and specialized courses, we’re not just expanding catalogs — we’re expanding opportunity. Together, we’re building a model where resources are maximized, and students are empowered to reach their goals in ways that fit their lives.”

 

What Does a Learner-First Workforce Model Look Like in Practice?

What Does a Learner-First Workforce Model Look Like in Practice?

What Does a Learner-First Workforce Model Look Like in Practice?

What does a “learner-first workforce model” actually mean in practice?

A learner-first workforce model starts with who today’s students are and designs education around their realities, not institutional convenience.

At Purdue Global, this means recognizing that:

  • Over 60% of students are age 30+
  • 78% have family responsibilities
  • Most are working while enrolled

Instead of treating these as constraints, the model treats them as design inputs.

Example:

Purdue Global awarded over 1 million prior learning credits in 2024–2025, translating real-world experience into academic progress.

Why it matters:

This approach aligns directly with the Presidents Forum mission to “reinvent higher education around learner success” and expand opportunity for nontraditional students.


How are programs designed to align with workforce needs?

Programs are built starting from labor market demand, not academic tradition.

At Purdue Global, program design integrates three inputs:

  1. Employer partnerships (real-time workforce needs)
  2. Faculty practitioners (active in their industries)
  3. Strategic foresight teams (future skill demand)

Example:

In advanced manufacturing, Purdue Global partnered with an industry employer to co-design curriculum tailored to specific workforce gaps, then validated that design directly with the employer before launch .

Why it matters:

This reflects a broader Presidents Forum priority: connecting education directly to opportunity and employer demand through collaborative innovation.


What role do employer partnerships play in shaping programs?

Employer partnerships are not advisory. They are co-design partners.

They influence:

  • Curriculum structure
  • Skill prioritization
  • Credential pathways
  • Delivery formats

Example:

Employer input shaped a manufacturing pathway that includes:

  • A 2-credit entry course
  • A flexible 3-course micro-credential
  • Direct pathways into bachelor’s degrees

Why it matters:

This ensures programs are “true, relevant, and legitimate” in the labor market, reducing the gap between education and employment.


How do stackable credentials improve student outcomes?

Stackable credentials turn education into incremental, career-relevant progress rather than a single high-stakes degree.

At Purdue Global:

  • Micro-credentials are embedded inside degrees
  • Each step delivers immediate labor market value
  • Students can stop and start without losing progress

Example pathway:

  1. Introductory course → entry into field
  2. Micro-credential → targeted skill building
  3. Bachelor’s degree → long-term advancement

Even partial completion delivers value.

Why it matters:

This aligns with the Presidents Forum’s focus on “credentials at scale” and stackable pathways that connect learners to opportunity faster.


How are programs designed specifically for working adults?

Programs are designed to remove friction, not add it.

Key design principles include:

1. Predictable learning experience

Every course follows the same structure, so students don’t waste time relearning systems.

2. Continuous start dates

Students don’t wait for semesters. They start when ready.

3. Policies built for real life

Flexible options account for:

  • Work disruptions
  • Family responsibilities
  • Military deployment

4. 24/7 support ecosystem

Includes advisors, coaches, and AI-enabled assistance.

Example:

Military learners can continue coursework during deployment with faculty trained to support their context.

Why it matters:

This reflects a core Presidents Forum principle: education should adapt to students, not the other way around.


What is the role of innovation leadership in driving these models?

Innovation is not a department. It is a cross-functional capability.

The “innovation catalyst” role at Purdue Global:

  • Connects academic teams, employers, and system partners
  • Challenges existing models
  • Identifies new delivery and credential approaches

Example:

Innovation leadership enables rapid program iteration based on industry shifts (e.g., technology changes in nursing or accounting).

Why it matters:

This mirrors how Presidents Forum institutions operate collectively, using shared insight and collaboration to drive system-level change beyond any single institution.


What does this model signal about the future of higher education?

The learner-first workforce model signals a shift from:

  • Degrees as endpoints → degrees as pathways
  • Time-based learning → skills-based progression
  • Institutional control → student-centered design

Presidents Forum institutions are leading this shift by:

  • Serving working adults, military learners, and underserved populations
  • Embedding skills and workforce alignment into program design
  • Partnering across institutions and industries to scale innovation

Bottom line:

Higher education’s future belongs to institutions that design for real lives, real jobs, and real outcomes.

Transcript:

00;00;05;14 – 00;00;29;03 Shalise Obray Welcome to the President’s Forum podcast. As part of our April Focus on the Learner First workforce. We’re highlighting how member institutions are designing programs that connect directly to opportunity. Today, I’m joined by Marcelle Lawrence, who serves as innovation catalyst at Purdue Global, an institution that has been deeply intentional about aligning programs to high demand industries while supporting working learners.

00;00;29;08 – 00;00;45;07 Shalise Obray Marcelle, thank you for being here. We’re excited to dig into how you’re building these pathways. Let’s start at a high level. When you think about the learner first workforce model, what does that mean at Purdue Global and how does that shape the way you design programs.

00;00;45;10 – 00;01;10;29 Maricel Lawrence Next slide. Thank you so much for having me today. I would like to start by sharing that Purdue Global is Purdue’s online university for working adults. We serve as a vital component of the Purdue University system, leveraging 150 year legacy of excellence to make it an accessible tool, a diverse audience, and to support Purdue’s main brand mission.

00;01;11;01 – 00;01;47;23 Maricel Lawrence So for us, learner first means recognizing that over 60% of our students are over age 30 and 78% have family responsibilities. We value the life and work experience they bring. We are exceptionally good at recognizing this experience through prior learning. So for example, in 2024, 2025, we approved more than 1 million credits through this process. So with that in mind, our program design starts with the workforce needs of today.

00;01;47;26 – 00;02;17;04 Maricel Lawrence We build offerings with a skills first mindset that lead to degrees that employers respect in what we need immediate industry demands. Our strategic foresight team that was launched in 2021 also evaluates possible future needs. This allows us to build a future oriented curriculum that ensures our learners are not just prepared for the next job, but for the long term evolution of their industries.

00;02;17;06 – 00;02;31;18 Shalise Obray That’s really wise. I did want to ask you an innovation catalyst is a really unique title and not something we hear all of the time. How does that how does that work in practice? What does that mean to you to to have that title?

00;02;31;25 – 00;03;01;00 Maricel Lawrence Yeah. Thank you. Thank you for that question. So, what my role does is works across the institution. And so we’re talking about new program development today. And that’s one of the areas that I have been supporting in. And what that means is being able to collaborate with the academic teams, connect with industry partnerships, connect with other stakeholders in the system to be able to support the needs of our students.

00;03;01;01 – 00;03;15;26 Maricel Lawrence And my role is to be able to say, it’s great that we’re doing the work that we’re doing this way. Is there any other models? Is there anything else that we can do to be able to innovate and and support the industry and our students as the world keeps evolving?

00;03;15;28 – 00;03;36;13 Shalise Obray I love that that’s a great that’s a great title and a great, portfolio to have. One of the things Purdue Global does particularly well is aligning programs to high demand industries. Can you walk us through how you identify those needs and how employer partnerships are shaping your program design and delivery?

00;03;36;15 – 00;04;09;08 Maricel Lawrence Yeah. So, Purdue Global, the new program development process can start in a variety of ways. So we rely on school advisory boards for new offering ideas. And I mentioned our strategic foresight team or year to year and emerging trends with academic teams. Now we also leverage our full time and adjunct instructors with deep field expertise. They are active in their fields, understanding real time evolutions.

00;04;09;10 – 00;04;40;13 Maricel Lawrence Think about the shift in technology, in nursing, or how, the current state of accounting is. And so they bring those needs directly to our teams to think about in mapping and evaluate. We also work closely with Purdue online. We collaborated as a system to offer content. This involves deep research with our joint R&D team to identify and explore ideas before bringing them to the academic teams to build.

00;04;40;15 – 00;05;17;13 Maricel Lawrence And, you know, we work directly with employers to support their specific needs. There is an example that we have, in advanced manufacturing sector, where we have partnered with a major industry leader to figure it out exactly how to support their unique workforce requirements through customized curriculum. And I’m happy to share more about that experience once we receive those ideas and we explore them, then we confirm back with industry to build a personal education that is true, relevant and legitimate.

00;05;17;16 – 00;05;30;15 Shalise Obray You’ve also taken a strong approach to stackable credentials. Can you share an example of how learners can start with a short term credential and build toward a degree, while staying connected to workforce outcomes along the way?

00;05;30;18 – 00;05;55;13 Maricel Lawrence Yeah, that’s a that’s a great question. So I would say there are several industry is bad. Because this has worked really, really well. I’ll share that at Purdue Global. We build micro-credentials that are typically embedded within a degree. And this ensures that every step a student take has immediate market value. Now, we don’t usually do this in a vacuum.

00;05;55;13 – 00;06;26;26 Maricel Lawrence Right. So we work hand in hand with employers to figure it out. The best way for, sort of the best pathway for a specific workforce. And so I mentioned the manufacturing, experience earlier in. So I’ll share that example in more detail and how we have done that step ability approach. So with that, that partner we design two credit introductory course to give us students fast, accessible entry point into the field.

00;06;26;28 – 00;06;51;10 Maricel Lawrence Then we build a three course micro credential that students can navigate in any order based on their immediate job needs. So students will start in the two credit courses to understand the foundations of manufacturing. And then they move through the micro credential in any order that makes the most sense for them. Now, if they complete the micro credential, that’s a win.

00;06;51;13 – 00;07;16;18 Maricel Lawrence But even if they don’t finish the whole sequence, they have gained the specific content that they need for that moment in their career. And now for those ready to move farther, we have a direct path into a bachelor’s in applied manufacturing. Or if they want to go into management, we say they can go into the bachelor’s in business administration and other types of of degrees.

00;07;16;20 – 00;07;42;13 Maricel Lawrence So there, you know, when it comes to industry partnerships, I would say manufacturing is one of those examples that we have seen a lot of a lot of value in in the conversation about stack ability in general as an Indiana based institution. We work very closely with Ivy Tech community colleges to create a seamless, strong pathway from an associate’s degree to a bachelor’s degree.

00;07;42;16 – 00;08;07;21 Maricel Lawrence And so we also provide scholarships for Ivy tech graduates to ensure that they have the support to to keep moving. And so this stackable approach turns education into a series of stable stepping stones that provide real opportunities for more and allows our students to build this experience that fits forward for their lives.

00;08;07;23 – 00;08;33;12 Shalise Obray That’s really smart design. Allowing students to to to have that value at every step of the process. We know that many, if not all of your students are balancing jobs and families, and other life things with their education. What are some of the design decisions that you’ve made? To make sure that these programs are working for working learners.

00;08;33;15 – 00;09;05;27 Maricel Lawrence Yeah. Thank you so much for that question. From our very origins, Purdue Global has been, built specifically for the busy adult learner. We, of course, offer online classes, and we have engineering ecosystem risk critical components. But we consider the minimum standard for adult learner success. One of our most impactful decisions or design decisions in our, work is the standardized course design.

00;09;05;29 – 00;09;38;07 Maricel Lawrence Every course follows the same structure so that students don’t have to waste time learning where content is located every time they start a new term, they can dive straight into their learning because they know where the content is located in our platform, and we don’t make the students wait months for a traditional semester to begin with. Classes starting constantly or learners can begin their program when they are ready.

00;09;38;09 – 00;10;08;13 Maricel Lawrence And I would say another component that I think is critical is that our policies are designed for life’s interruptions. Life happens. Right. And offering list of options when they are most needed is is critical. I always speak about, the unique challenges of our military students. For example, when a student is deployed, they need a university that understands that experience.

00;10;08;16 – 00;10;43;08 Maricel Lawrence Our faculty are specifically trained to work with the students, ensuring their education stays on track regardless of where they are stationed. And, we also provide a series of types of support for our learners, including academic advisors and coaches. And of course, now we’re leveraging AI and technology to ensure we are available 24 over seven media students exactly when they have a question, right, whether it is a noon or a two in the morning.

00;10;43;11 – 00;11;16;25 Maricel Lawrence We need to be there and support them. So we are we we are very critical about how we support different types of learners and the type of needs. So they have, I think about the needs of one adult learner with prior college experience, are vastly different from someone starting fresh. So we develop targeted interventions to meet each learner where they are ensuring all of the different type of audiences have the specific resources they need to reach their goals.

00;11;16;28 – 00;11;38;05 Shalise Obray Well, Marcel, what stands out here is the intentionality in designing programs that don’t just deliver content, but are worked around how learners live and how they need to learn and work. So thank you so much for sharing the work you’re doing. And, for, for talking with us today.

00;11;38;07 – 00;11;40;08 Maricel Lawrence Absolutely. In this match for the opportunity.

00;11;40;10 – 00;11;49;14 Shalise Obray And thank you to everyone listening. These are the kinds of ideas and approaches that are shaping what a learner first workforce can look like. We’ll continue the conversation soon.

Expanding Opportunity for Those Who Serve

Expanding Opportunity for Those Who Serve

Expanding Opportunity for Those Who Serve

Why it matters

Military learners balance service, family, and education under extraordinary conditions.

Higher education policy must reflect that reality.

The challenge

Military learners face:

  • Frequent relocations
  • Unpredictable schedules
  • Training that isn’t always recognized for credit
  • Complex transfer and enrollment systems

Bottom line

Military learners remind us why student-first innovation matters.

Our job is to build systems that match their commitment with opportunity.

The Power of Student Leadership

The Power of Student Leadership

The Power of Student Leadership

Why it matters

Student voice is not symbolic. It shapes policy, funding, and institutional priorities in real time.

The story

Josiah Rodriguez, a first-generation college student at San Antonio College, enrolled the same day as his mother, who returned to earn her GED through Alamo Colleges’ adult education program.

Today, he serves as the first student trustee in the Texas system, representing more than 88,000 students across Alamo Colleges.

The impact

As student trustee, he:

  • Serves as a liaison between students and the board
  • Brings student concerns directly into trustee meetings
  • Advocates for wraparound services that support persistence
  • Helped support a fundraiser that raised $140,000 for GED programs

What makes this different

Alamo Colleges invests in systems that remove barriers:

  • Free GED programs
  • Food pantries and grab-and-go meals
  • Childcare support
  • Counseling services
  • Community-based training centers

These services help students stay enrolled, protect Pell eligibility, and complete credentials.

Bottom line

Student-centered leadership is not theoretical. When institutions invite students into governance, the result is stronger policy, stronger support systems, and stronger outcomes.