Data-Driven Revolution: Beth Akers on Reshaping Higher Education

Data-Driven Revolution: Beth Akers on Reshaping Higher Education

Data-Driven Revolution: Beth Akers on Reshaping Higher Education

Marty Carpenter: Having Accountability in Higher Education

by KSL Inside Sources

The big picture

Beth Akers, senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, discusses the critical role of data in improving higher education outcomes and decision-making.

Key takeaways

  • Data transparency is crucial: Akers emphasizes the need for comprehensive data on student outcomes to help prospective students make informed decisions about their education.
  • College Transparency Act: This proposed legislation aims to require colleges to collect and report detailed data on enrollment, completion rates, and post-college earnings.
  • Addressing “data blind spots”: Current limitations in higher education data make it difficult to assess if institutions are serving all students equitably.
  • Return on investment: Better data can help students evaluate the potential value of their college education and choose programs more likely to lead to successful outcomes.
  • Balancing privacy and transparency: Akers acknowledges the need to protect student privacy while advocating for increased data availability to improve educational outcomes.

What’s next

As debates around student loan forgiveness continue, the push for greater accountability and transparency in higher education is likely to gain momentum. The implementation of data-driven policies could significantly impact how students, families, and policymakers approach higher education decisions in the future.

The Presidents Forum is ramping up its thought leadership initiatives and expanding its reach

The Presidents Forum is ramping up its thought leadership initiatives and expanding its reach

What’s happening 

  • New website launch: (http://presidensforum.org) now serves as a hub for presidential thought leadership, with frequent content updates.
  • Upcoming features: A news aggregation service will offer daily curated higher education articles.
  • Content focus: September highlighted presidential transition advice, while October will feature best practices for supporting underserved communities.

Upcoming events 

  • November: In-person meetings in Tempe, Arizona, focusing on AI, semiconductor industry, presidential transitions, and higher education financing.
  • March 24-25, 2025: Spring meeting in Washington, DC, to engage with the new administration and Congress.

What’s next 

The Forum seeks feedback, recommendations for new institutions, and continued collaboration to advance innovation in higher education.

WGU President Advocates for Accountability and Bold Reform

WGU President Advocates for Accountability and Bold Reform

WGU President Advocates for Accountability and Bold Reform

Why it matters

Higher education institutions need to be held accountable for student outcomes and embrace innovation to remain relevant and valuable.

The big picture

President Pulsipher emphasizes two main points:

  • Increasing accountability for outcomes: Institutions should prove their value by demonstrating how they improve students’ lives.
  • Encouraging innovation: Policies should incentivize new models that expand access, lower costs, and increase relevance to future work.

By the numbers

WGU measures its impact through the “Factor Graduate Return”:

  • Graduates see a median 26x return on their investment
  • Some programs yield over 50x return
  • Even lower-return programs in education see 12-15x returns

Between the lines

President Pulsipher argues that higher education should democratize opportunity, not stratify society further.

The bottom line

President Pulsipher argues that higher education should democratize opportunity, not stratify society further.

Delivering Lift

Delivering Lift

Delivering Lift

The big picture

UMass Global Chancellor David Andrews advises the Department of Education to focus on improving student outcomes and experiences while maintaining accountability.

Key Points

  • Challenge legacy metrics like seat time and Carnegie units
  • Rethink “regular and substantive interaction” for the on-demand learning era
  • Develop metrics that measure student growth or “lift” rather than raw outcomes
  • Implement real-time predictive analytics to support struggling students
  • Increase investment in innovation pilots, especially for working adult learners

The bottom line

The Department of Education should take more risks in piloting innovative approaches and work more collaboratively with accreditors to streamline processes and foster innovation.

Why Improving Educational Benefits Is a Good Deal for the Military and Service Members

Why Improving Educational Benefits Is a Good Deal for the Military and Service Members

By Dr. Mark D. Milliron, National University

The nation’s population of college students is evolving rapidly, reflecting a broader spectrum of life experiences and responsibilities. Today’s learners are not only pursuing their degrees but are also balancing roles as parents, caregivers, and dedicated professionals. This shift is particularly evident in the growing number of military-affiliated students who are bringing their unique perspectives and experiences to higher education. 

At National University, where I serve as president, about one-fourth of our entire student body is military-affiliated, as are half of all National University undergraduate students. These learners are integrating their service backgrounds into their educational pursuits and enriching the campus environment in the process. Our institution was founded in 1971 by retired U.S. Navy Capt. Dr. David Chigos, who saw a need for more educational opportunities that support deployed soldiers and Veterans. Today, National University remains a top educator of the U.S. military.

Military educational benefits, especially tuition assistance, can be a powerful force that ensures Veterans can succeed in civilian life and infuse the nation’s workforce with a steady supply of experienced and disciplined talent. Yet for many military-affiliated students, military benefits are no longer such a good deal, as the buying power of military tuition assistance has diminished rapidly. Few military members are taking advantage of the program. And according to a recent report from Rand Corp., military transition programs aren’t living up to their promise of helping service members translate their military skills and experience to the civilian labor force.

Higher education should serve as a crucial bridge between military service and civilian employment. The United States has an obligation to support military members during and after their service. Enhancing and expanding the utilization of current tuition assistance programs can help service members gain more skills for their current roles and prepare them for their civilian careers.

For years education benefits have ranked among the top reasons for joining the military. But the Department of Defense’s Tuition Assistance program that provides financial aid to active-duty service members is capped at $250 per credit hour and at $4,500 per year. At that rate, a service member who relies solely on program support would need seven years to earn an associate’s degree. And while college tuition and fees have risen dramatically in recent years, the program’s annual cap has not been increased since its inception in 2001. 

Tuition assistance programs should provide enough funding so service members can earn a credential in a timely manner. Raising the cap to reflect the true cost of higher education is a simple and long-overdue fix.

Current funding levels for military education benefits are creating challenges for both service members and the institutions that serve them. Participation in the tuition assistance program has grown less cost-effective over time; indeed, a growing number of institutions are opting out because they no longer have the resources to sustain their support for active-duty service members. More ominously, the Army might follow the lead of other branches, which cut education benefits during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. 

Lawmakers should increase funding to the Defense Department’s education benefits so it can serve current students more effectively and encourage more service members to participate. Even a significant increase in tuition assistance would constitute just a small fraction of the Defense Department’s overall $850 billion budget request.

Finally, a 2017 Rand study found something surprising: Less than a quarter of new recruits were aware of the education benefits available to them. In addition, only about 20% of service members currently use tuition assistance. 

As the tuition assistance program is modernized and improved, military leaders, policymakers and postsecondary institutions must ensure that more recruits and service members learn about this program and are motivated by the educational opportunities the military can provide.

To deal effectively with escalating global tensions, the U.S. must redouble its efforts to build and maintain a capable military. Improving tuition assistance and other education benefits can help our armed forces maneuver through a challenging recruitment landscape and invest in the futures of our service members.