Redesigning Affordability to Make College Work for Students

Redesigning Affordability to Make College Work for Students

Redesigning Affordability to Make College Work for Students

The problem

College costs have outpaced earnings for decades, and the system that determines them is too complex for students to navigate. Affordability can’t just mean cutting expenses — it must mean redesigning higher education around the needs of learners.

The idea

Making college truly affordable means rethinking how we use time, money, and accountability. Programs should be faster, simpler, and priced transparently. Institutions that align costs with outcomes deliver real value for students.

What’s working

BYU Pathway Worldwide is showing what’s possible. Its three-year degree model reduces tuition by 25 percent and delivers a full bachelor’s degree for about $6,300. The approach starts with short, stackable certificates that connect directly to employment and then build toward degrees.

Why it matters

Affordability fails when we ignore the full cost of attendance—time, housing, and complexity. Clear pricing and simple aid structures help students plan and persist. Every dollar and hour saved matters.

The shift ahead

True affordability requires accountability. States and institutions must measure and publish real value—how programs lead to completion, employment, and upward mobility. Public investment should reward results that improve students’ lives.

The bottom line

Three-year degrees. One clear price. Transparent results.

Affordability isn’t about marginal savings. It’s about redesigning higher education for the students it serves.

Student Voices Matter More Than Ever

Student Voices Matter More Than Ever

Student Voices Matter More Than Ever

The big idea

November is all about Student Voices—the stories and perspectives that remind us why innovation in higher education must start with the learner.

Why it matters

Students are the pulse of every conversation about change. Their lived experiences cut through policy debates and bring focus to what matters most: access, relevance, and success.

What’s next

We’ll carry that momentum into our Spring Policy Meeting in Washington, DC on March 24–25, 2026. Expect deeper dives on student engagement, equity, and data-informed innovation.

The ask

This month, we invite member institutions to highlight how their students are being served and heard. Share examples, stories, and insights that capture the learner perspective and how it’s shaping your campus.

The bottom line

Every innovation starts with listening. Centering students isn’t just good practice—it’s the path forward for higher education.

Mastery Over Minutes: Modernizing Federal Aid for Today’s Learners

Mastery Over Minutes: Modernizing Federal Aid for Today’s Learners

Mastery Over Minutes: Modernizing Federal Aid for Today’s Learners

Why it matters:

Higher education still measures learning by time—the Carnegie Unit. But “seat time” doesn’t reflect what students actually know or can do.

The shift:

Competency-Based Education (CBE) measures mastery, not minutes. It’s built for working parents, service members, and adults balancing school, work, and life.

The fix:

Federal policy must recognize CBE as a valid pathway, modernize Title IV aid rules, and fund Credit for Prior Learning (CPL) so students don’t pay twice for what they’ve already mastered.

The result:

A system that values learning over time—expanding access, reducing cost, and aligning education with today’s workforce.

Designing Easier Paths to Student Success

Designing Easier Paths to Student Success

Designing Easier Paths to Student Success

The big picture:

Chancellor David Andrews from UMass Global and President Brian Blake of Georgia State University, reframed what it means to make higher education easier. It’s not about lowering standards — it’s about smarter design, stronger connections to work, and precision in outcomes.

Driving the news:

  • Georgia State is rethinking course timing and assessment — placing tests when students learn best and creating recitations that build mastery. The result: higher performance without lowering expectations.
  • Employers value persistence, communication, and judgment. Blake says merging classroom learning with industry practice helps students build those life skills in real time.
  • On AI: treat it like the calculator — a tool that expands capacity, not replaces effort. Use it to tackle bigger, more complex problems with more precise answers.

State of play:

  • Rigor means precision, not workload. Assign fewer tasks but demand deeper thinking and targeted solutions.
  • Access means meeting students where they are. Georgia State routes learners along personalized pathways — two-year to four-year to graduate — ensuring each can succeed on their own timeline.

What’s next:

  • Smaller classes, shorter lectures, more hands-on maker spaces.
  • Real-world learning embedded with employers.
  • AI-powered guidance to align student skills with workforce needs.

The bottom line:

“Easier” should mean more precise, more relevant, and more equitable. The future of higher education blends rigor with relevance — designing systems that help every student reach full potential without needless friction.

Boston 2025: Action and Alignment

Boston 2025: Action and Alignment

Boston 2025: Action and Alignment

The big picture:

At the Presidents Forum Boston 2025 meeting, higher ed leaders, researchers, and policymakers came together to confront the defining challenges shaping the future of colleges and students — from declining enrollment and public trust to the governance of artificial intelligence.

Driving the news:

  • Gallup’s Janet Gibbon opened with sobering new data: declining enrollment and waning confidence in the value of a degree. Presidents shared how they’re restoring trust by connecting learning to work, well-being, and purpose.
  • Michael Horn and Rajen Sheth led a working session on AI in higher ed, exploring how institutions can innovate responsibly — balancing access and equity with ethics and governance.
  • Patti Kohler (WGU) and Alex Ricci (NCHER) briefed members on federal rulemaking and financial aid integrity, underscoring the Forum’s role in ensuring affordability, transparency, and student protection.

Between the lines:

The Forum’s strength lies in collective action. Each session turned policy debate into implementation strategy, aligning diverse institutional perspectives around a shared mission: keep students at the center.

The bottom line:

Boston 2025 wasn’t just another higher ed meeting. It was a call to act — to align policy, practice, and leadership around one goal: ensuring every student’s success remains the benchmark of institutional accountability.