The Future of Higher Ed Regulation

The Future of Higher Ed Regulation

The Future of Higher Ed Regulation

Big picture:

A panel of higher education experts discussed recent changes in Department of Education regulations, particularly focusing on negotiated rulemaking and distance learning oversight.

Key panelists:

  • Phil Hill – Ed tech expert and reporter
  • Scott Pulsipher – Western Governors University president
  • Mark Milliron – National University president

Key takeaways:

  • “Whiplash” effect: The Department’s sudden shift in December marked an unprecedented change in their approach to regulation
  • Process concerns: Panelists agreed that earlier engagement with higher education institutions could have prevented unintended consequences
  • Modern learner focus: Regulations need to account for today’s diverse student population, including working adults and lifelong learners

2025 New Years Resolutions

2025 New Years Resolutions

2025 New Years Resolutions

The Big Picture

The Presidents Forum is setting ambitious goals for 2025, focusing on three core principles:

Core principles

  • Working Learners First: Supporting students balancing education with careers and family
  • Student-Centered Innovation: Every decision starts with student benefit
  • Quality & Accessibility: Breaking down barriers while maintaining standards

What’s Next

The Forum’s 2025 policy agenda includes:

  • Data reforms for better tracking student success
  • Increased military tuition assistance
  • Student-owned learning records
  • Equal treatment for remote learning
Excelsior’s Constellation strategy for developing transformative partnerships with other institutions

Excelsior’s Constellation strategy for developing transformative partnerships with other institutions

Excelsior’s Constellation strategy for developing transformative partnerships with other institutions

Big Picture

Excelsior is pioneering a constellation model of higher education partnerships to create seamless student experiences across multiple institutions.

Why it matters

Traditional partnerships and mergers in higher education are often rigid and bureaucratic. This new model aims to be more flexible and student-centric.

Key features of the constellation model:

  • Students can move between partner institutions for specific experiences
  • Includes short-term, intensive in-person programs
  • Seamless credit transfer between institutions
  • Integration with employer needs and workforce development

The bottom line:

Excelsior’s constellation model could revolutionize how institutions collaborate, offering students the flexibility to combine online learning with targeted in-person experiences.

Miami Dade College: Making Higher Education More Affordable

Miami Dade College: Making Higher Education More Affordable

Miami Dade College: Making Higher Education More Affordable

The big picture

Miami Dade College has achieved a remarkable 98% debt-free graduation rate.

 

Why it matters

In an era where student debt is crippling millions, MDC’s model demonstrates how institutions can deliver affordable education without compromising quality.

 

By the numbers:

  • 70% of students come from low-income homes
  • Only 1,800 out of 125,000 students took loans last year
  • No tuition increase in 12 years

Key strategies:

  • Focus on institutional efficiency over tuition hikes
  • Early financial literacy education and FAFSA support
  • Strategic deployment of scholarships and aid
  • Leveraging state programs like Bright Futures

Higher Ed Affordability Roundtable

Higher Ed Affordability Roundtable

Higher Ed Affordability Roundtable

The big picture

College leaders Sue Ellspermann (Ivy Tech) and Justin Lonon (Dallas College) discuss how their institutions are tackling affordability by eliminating textbook costs and putting students first.

Why it matters

Their initiatives have saved students millions while improving academic outcomes and retention rates.

Key takeaways:

  • Both institutions eliminated profits from textbook sales
  • Early access to materials improved student success rates
  • Low-income and underrepresented students saw the biggest gains • Technology and AI will continue driving costs down

AI in Teacher Education

AI in Teacher Education

AI in Teacher Education

The big picture

Education schools are grappling with AI integration, with concerns about plagiarism dominating the conversation and faculty confidence remaining low.

 

Key findings

  • Plagiarism focus: Current AI discussions in education heavily center on detection and prevention, despite unreliable detection tools
  • Faculty concerns: Include data privacy, job security, and unclear usage guidelines
  • Leadership outlook: Program leaders show balanced optimism about AI’s potential while acknowledging risks

 

What’s next

  • Internal changes: Universities need to incentivize faculty engagement and provide AI training
  • External support: State policymakers could revise teaching certification standards to include AI literacy
  • Collaboration: Education schools should partner with AI experts and peer institutions to avoid reinventing the wheel