What Cengage Work Is Watching on Workforce Pell

What Cengage Work Is Watching on Workforce Pell

What Cengage Work Is Watching on Workforce Pell

We spoke with Rya Conrad-Bradshaw of Cengage Work to understand how their organization is approaching Workforce Pell as federal rulemaking begins. Her comments reflect Cengage Work’s perspective and add to the range of viewpoints emerging across the workforce and higher education ecosystem.

Why it matters

Workforce Pell will influence how institutions deliver short, job-aligned programs for working learners. Presidents Forum members operate across states, modalities, and workforce sectors, making it important to track how different organizations are interpreting the policy environment.

Key points from the conversation

  • Non-credit programs: Cengage Work highlighted the need to include non-credit workforce programs and to create clear pathways that connect non-credit learning to credit-bearing credentials.
  • Partnership models: Many institutions rely on external partners for technical or specialized workforce training. Cengage Work is focused on how these partnerships will be defined and regulated under Workforce Pell.
  • State implementation: With governors and state workforce boards involved, Cengage Work expects variation across states—a key factor for institutions serving multi-state or online student populations.
  • Outcomes: For short-term programs, Cengage Work pointed to completion, job placement, and earnings as central measures, acknowledging that shorter programs operate on different timelines than traditional degrees.

Looking ahead

Presidents Forum will continue elevating diverse perspectives to support member awareness as Workforce Pell moves through rulemaking and toward implementation.

Designing Community Colleges for Today’s Learners

Designing Community Colleges for Today’s Learners

Designing Community Colleges for Today’s Learners

Community colleges are being redesigned for the new majority of learners — working adults, parents, and career shifters. Presidents Kate Smith (Rio Salado College) and Janet Spriggs (Forsyth Tech) explain how.

Why it matters:

The traditional “full-time, first-time” student is no longer the norm. Colleges must adapt at the speed of innovation.

The shift:

  • Short, stackable learning “buckets” let students earn skills in weeks, get a raise, and return later to keep climbing.
  • Employers help co-design programs from day one — not after the fact.
  • Durable skills (communication, teamwork, critical thinking + AI fluency) are now core currency.
  • Local customization + nationally scalable models can coexist.

The goal:

Pathways that lead to family-sustaining wages and give learners lifelong on-ramps and off-ramps as jobs evolve.

The mindset change:

Move beyond tradition. Build workforce and learning ecosystems together with the industry. Collaborate, don’t compete. Share what works so more students can move out of poverty and into opportunity.

Bottom line:

Community colleges are positioned to lead the future — if they stay flexible, employer-aligned, and relentlessly learner-first.

What the RISE Committee’s Consensus Means

What the RISE Committee’s Consensus Means

What the RISE Committee’s Consensus Means

Why it matters:

The Department of Education’s RISE Committee reached full consensus on major components of the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” giving institutions and students early clarity on coming federal aid changes.

Loan amounts will scale with enrollment

Students attending less than full-time will receive loan disbursements prorated to the number of credits they’re enrolled in.

Clearer rules for “professional degree” loan limits

The committee adopted a four-part test to determine which programs qualify as “professional” (meaning they’re eligible for higher annual and aggregate loan caps).

Repayment gets a smoother on-ramp

Past IDR payments will count toward forgiveness under the new Repayment Assistance Plan (RAP). RAP payments will also count toward legacy IDR plans during the transition so borrowers won’t lose credit for any qualifying payments.

What’s next

The Department is expected to release the NPRM in early 2026. The AHEAD Committee begins its work soon, shaping the next wave of regulatory changes.

Bottom line:

This consensus brings to life the major provisions outlined in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Now institutions must prepare to update systems, advising, and communications to support students through the transition.

Opportunity in Action: The 3D Scholarship Advantage

Opportunity in Action: The 3D Scholarship Advantage

Opportunity in Action: The 3D Scholarship Advantage

A model for access and affordability.

Prince George’s County Public Schools, Prince George’s Community College, and the University of Maryland Global Campus are proving what’s possible when systems align around student success.

How it works:

  • Up to 50 students enter the 3D Scholars program each year through a lottery in ninth grade.
  • The “3D” stands for three credentials: a high school diploma, an associate degree, and a bachelor’s degree.
  • Learners complete college coursework while in high school and can finish a four-year degree within two years of graduation.

Why it matters:

The full pathway—high school through bachelor’s—costs under $10,000. That means students can launch careers debt-free and faster, building momentum for themselves and for the state’s workforce.

The impact:

3D Scholars has become one of the most sought-after programs in Prince George’s County, drawing hundreds of applicants each year. It expands access, accelerates progress, and strengthens economic mobility—without asking learners to mortgage their futures.

The takeaway:

When K–12, community colleges, and universities collaborate, students gain time, savings, and opportunity—and higher education gains a blueprint for scalable innovation.

When Compassion Drives Completion

When Compassion Drives Completion

When Compassion Drives Completion

The big picture:

Students carry life with them into learning. Family responsibilities, health crises, and loss don’t pause for coursework—and too often, these challenges derail even the most determined learners.

Why it matters:

Compassionate design in higher education isn’t a luxury. It’s the difference between students stopping out and breaking through.

What worked:

  • Instructors offered time, flexibility, and encouragement.
  • Weekly cohort meetings created structure, trust, and belonging.
  • A shared space for learning became a shared space for healing.

The result:

Education turned into community. Confidence replaced doubt. Purpose returned.

The takeaway:

When institutions lead with empathy, students don’t just persist—they thrive.

Redesigning Affordability to Make College Work for Students

Redesigning Affordability to Make College Work for Students

Redesigning Affordability to Make College Work for Students

The problem

College costs have outpaced earnings for decades, and the system that determines them is too complex for students to navigate. Affordability can’t just mean cutting expenses — it must mean redesigning higher education around the needs of learners.

The idea

Making college truly affordable means rethinking how we use time, money, and accountability. Programs should be faster, simpler, and priced transparently. Institutions that align costs with outcomes deliver real value for students.

What’s working

BYU Pathway Worldwide is showing what’s possible. Its three-year degree model reduces tuition by 25 percent and delivers a full bachelor’s degree for about $6,300. The approach starts with short, stackable certificates that connect directly to employment and then build toward degrees.

Why it matters

Affordability fails when we ignore the full cost of attendance—time, housing, and complexity. Clear pricing and simple aid structures help students plan and persist. Every dollar and hour saved matters.

The shift ahead

True affordability requires accountability. States and institutions must measure and publish real value—how programs lead to completion, employment, and upward mobility. Public investment should reward results that improve students’ lives.

The bottom line

Three-year degrees. One clear price. Transparent results.

Affordability isn’t about marginal savings. It’s about redesigning higher education for the students it serves.