What’s Next in Federal Rulemaking

What’s Next in Federal Rulemaking

What’s Next in Federal Rulemaking

Why it matters:

Three major negotiated rulemakings are moving forward at the same time, each with significant implications for institutions and students.

The big picture:

Alex Ricci of NCHER outlines where things stand with RISE, AHEAD, and the newly announced AIM committee. Each follows a different path, but all will shape federal student aid and accreditation policy.

RISE:
  • NPRM published in late January
  • Public comments due March 2
  • Focuses on student loan provisions and implementation details
  • Department is not strictly bound by prior consensus if public comments warrant change
AHEAD:
  • Covers Workforce Pell and programmatic earnings accountability
  • Committee reached consensus on both major issues
  • Workforce Pell language is already at OMB for review
  • NPRM expected in the coming weeks
AIM:
  • Focused on Accreditation, Innovation, and Modernization
  • Seeks to reduce regulatory burden and emphasize student outcomes
  • Nominations due February 26
  • Committee meets in April and May

Bottom line:

There is no slowdown in federal regulatory activity. Institutions that want to shape the outcome should track timelines closely and submit public comments where appropriate.

Preparing a Policy Agenda Built for Today’s Learners

Preparing a Policy Agenda Built for Today’s Learners

Preparing a Policy Agenda Built for Today’s Learners

Why it matters:

Higher education policy directly shapes access, affordability, and quality for working adults, military-affiliated learners, and other students balancing education with work and family.

The big picture:

The Presidents Forum approaches policy from a clear premise. Innovation begins with institutions responding to students, not with regulations telling institutions how to innovate. Policy works best when it reflects that reality and evolves to support effective new models.

What’s next:

February is a month for preparation and alignment. Forum presidents will come together in Washington, DC on March 24 and 25 to align priorities and engage policymakers with clarity and purpose.

Bottom line:

The goal is not reaction, but leadership. A thoughtful, student-centered policy agenda can help ensure policy supports innovation instead of standing in its way.

Jonathan Woods Joins the Presidents Forum as Military and Workforce Education Policy Fellow

Jonathan Woods Joins the Presidents Forum as Military and Workforce Education Policy Fellow

Dr. Jonathan Woods has joined the Presidents Forum as the Military and Workforce Education Policy Fellow. He brings more than 25 years of experience across military service, federal education systems, and workforce-aligned learning, with deep expertise in voluntary education programs serving servicemembers and working adults.

Jonathan previously directed the Department of Defense’s Off-Duty and Voluntary Education programs across all military services, overseeing large-scale education benefits and quality assurance systems serving hundreds of thousands of learners annually. His background includes leading the development of national data systems, credentialing and workforce alignment strategies, and institutional engagement models designed to improve participation, outcomes, and system accountability. Earlier in his career, he worked extensively in adult and workforce education, curriculum design, and learning systems analysis, including advising military schoolhouses on instructional effectiveness and return on investment.

In his fellowship role, Jonathan will work with the Presidents Forum team to support research, analysis, and institutional learning related to military and workforce education. His work will include helping the Forum learn from institutions serving military-connected learners, identifying shared challenges and strengths across institutions, and strengthening processes for gathering and sharing insight across the Forum’s membership. He will also support the Forum’s efforts to connect learner demand, institutional capacity, and workforce alignment in ways that reflect both operational realities and learner experience.

Through this fellowship, Jonathan will help the Presidents Forum build durable structures for understanding how education benefits, counseling systems, and data insights can better inform institutional practice and support service members and working adults as they navigate education and career pathways.

Measuring What Students Can Actually Do

Measuring What Students Can Actually Do

Measuring What Students Can Actually Do

The big idea:

Technology, especially AI, is making assessment easier, more authentic, and more scalable for adult learners by shifting the focus from seat time to demonstrated skills.

Why it matters:

Assessment is where most learning friction lives. When done poorly, it pushes faculty back to multiple-choice tests that fail to show what students can actually do.

What’s changing:

  • Performance-based assessment at scale: Technology reduces scheduling, scoring, and evidence-capture burdens.
  • AI as a faculty amplifier: Generative AI helps draft rubrics, simulations, and scenarios, freeing faculty to focus on judgment and feedback.
  • Simulations over tests: Learners demonstrate skills in real-world scenarios, not artificial exam conditions.
  • Beyond the transcript: Digital credentials and learning records make competencies portable and employer-relevant.

Bottom line:

Making higher education easier is not about lowering rigor. It is about measuring what matters.

How AI Turned Public Comments Into Policy Insight

How AI Turned Public Comments Into Policy Insight

How AI Turned Public Comments Into Policy Insight

Why it matters:

Public comment processes shape federal policy, but volume has made them hard to use. AI is changing that.

What happened:

Analyst Phil Hill used AI tools to analyze all 1,124 public comments submitted to the Department of Education ahead of negotiated rulemaking. Work that once took months now takes hours.

What he found:

  • Workforce Pell is harder than headlines suggest. The real risk is not runaway programs. It is guardrails so tight they may limit scale and impact.
  • Implementation is the battleground. Non-term programs, earnings measures, placement rates, and stackable credentials introduce complexity the aid system has not handled before.
  • Public comments contain real expertise. Financial aid leaders and practitioners surfaced practical insights that often get lost.

The bigger takeaway:

AI does not replace public input. It makes it usable. Thousands of fragmented comments become actionable intelligence for policymakers and negotiators.

What’s next:

Hill plans to reuse this AI-driven approach to evaluate upcoming rulemaking outcomes and to assess whether final regulations respond to what the public actually said.

Bottom line:

AI can transform public comments from a box-checking exercise into a learning engine for smarter, student-centered policy.

Making Education Work for Working Learners

Making Education Work for Working Learners

Q&A with Gregory W. Fowler, PhD, President, University of Maryland Global Campus (UMGC)

The question of higher education’s value is front and center for today’s learners and
employers. How is UMGC improving outcomes for adults in the workforce and military?

Today, learners and employers are increasingly likely to demand evidence of education’s return
on investment. At UMGC, we respond by designing learning experiences that meet students
where they are and align with the realities of the workplace. Listening to our learners is at the
core of that approach.

In a recent survey of UMGC’s winter 2025 graduate candidates, 35 percent reported that, as a
result of education, they had secured a new job, promotion, or raise, or made a career change,
some before ever crossing the stage. That speaks volumes about the power of learning
experiences that are flexible, career-relevant, skills-focused, and supported by services tailored
to working adults.

Similarly, in a recent alumni survey, 97 percent said their UMGC education prepared them well
for the workforce. Fully 40 percent reported salary increases, 40 percent advanced in their
current roles, and 32 percent changed jobs as direct outcomes of their education. These results
are a testament to the work we do every day.

How are partnerships helping amplify your impact?

Strategic partnerships continue to remove obstacles and accelerate learner progress. This year,
we worked with military leaders, police departments, and corporate partners to expand access
and turn real-world experience and training into academic credit. More than 83 percent of this
year’s graduates worked full-time while studying, and partnerships helped make that possible;
in fact, in FY 25, almost 6,000 learners had their education paid for in whole or in part by an
employer … saving them more than $23 million.

That impact is reflected in our graduating class, as well, which includes 2,218 learners who
enrolled through corporate partnerships. Another 1,802 are community college transfers, many
of whom enrolled through our alliances with more than 65 community colleges nationwide,
offering seamless credit transfers, no application fees, and access to dedicated advisors.

UMGC has always focused on meeting the needs of nontraditional and underserved
populations. What trends are you seeing?

This year, 17,855 learners earned a UMGC degree or certificate—the largest graduating class in
our history. More than 44 percent identified as underrepresented populations, a 24 percent
increase over last year. That is transformation in action. And thanks in part to expanded
transfer and work experience credits, time-to-degree dropped below 36 months for the first
time ever.

UMGC has a longstanding relationship with military learners. What changes have you seen
this year?

Serving military learners has been part of our DNA since 1947, and more than half of our
learners are military affiliated. This year, that demographic represented 42 percent of our
graduating class; veterans alone increased by 35 percent. By awarding credit for military rank,
we help these learners—who often face deployments and relocations—achieve their goals
faster, wherever they are in the world.

And we continue to expand career-relevant credential options. For example, our new Drones &
Autonomous Systems certificate program prepares learners to use these technologies in sectors
including public safety and defense. Other new technology-focused offerings include artificial
intelligence and supply chain logistics.

Cybersecurity also remains a popular option among military learners … and it’s not purely
academic. The UMGC cybersecurity team includes students, alumni, and faculty, and recently
earned first place honors in a regional competition that included hands-on coding,
cryptography, and network analysis challenges. Currently, the team ranks first in the United
States and sixth in the world among universities in the ongoing Hack the Box competition.

Where are you focused as we enter 2026?

Looking to 2026, our priorities are clear. Technology is evolving at lightning speed and shaping
our world in ever-changing ways. We believe that we must harness new and emerging
technologies to help us do more of what matters most, amplifying human connection and
learning. That means freeing faculty to mentor and inspire, empowering staff to innovate, and
ensuring every learner receives personalized support.

At UMGC, transformation isn’t a buzzword. It is a sustained commitment to reimagining what a
university can be and delivering on the promise of education for every student we serve.

###